ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION OF THE ORBIT IN PATIENTS WITH THYROIDASSOCIATED ORBITOPATHY - EXAMINATION GUIDE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EVERYDAY PRACTICE. A REVIEW.

The purpose of this study is to present the possibilities and benefits of ultrasonography (US) of the orbit in the diagnosis and treatment of thyroidassociated orbitopathy (TAO). Methods: US examination of the orbit is an essential addition to clinical and laboratory examination in TAO patients. Nevertheless, it is often neglected in clinical practice or indicated with delay. Based on previously published studies and our experience with the diagnosis and treatment of TAO patients, we aim to highlight the clear benefit of US examination of the orbit and oculomotor muscles, not only for correct TAO diagnosis but also in the monitoring of the disease over time. However, knowledge of the drawbacks and limitations of this method is also essential, as we shall point out. It is always necessary to remember that US examination must be evaluated in connection with the clinical findings. A detailed recommendation for US examination of the extraocular muscles and the orbit based on our experiences with diagnosing and treating TAO patients in daily practice is also included. Conclusion: According to our experience, US examination of the orbit is an excellent and irreplaceable tool for timely TAO diagnosis and further disease monitoring. However, considerable examiner experience and detailed knowledge of the clinical and ultrasound manifestations of TAO are essential.

Comparison of Three Methods of Tonometry in Patients with Inactive Thyroid-Associated Orbitopathy.

INTRODUCTION: Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement in patients with thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO) can be difficult and misleading, particularly in patients with diplopia and eye deviation (esotropia or hypotropia). However, when measuring IOP, it is also necessary to pay sufficient attention to TAO patients without diplopia in primary gaze direction and without motility disorder that might not be readily apparent. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) using three different types of tonometers: the rebound tonometer (iCARE), the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and the non-contact airpuff tonometer (NCT) in patients with inactive TAO.  Materials and Methods: A total of 98 eyes of 49 adult patients with TAO were examined. The study group included 36 females and 13 males, with an age range of 19-70 years and a median age of 55.0. All the patients had evidence of thyroid disease,  a history of mild to moderate TAO, no clinical signs or symptoms of active disease, and no diplopia in direct gaze direction. In addition to a comprehensive eye examination, all the patients underwent measurement of intraocular pressure with three tonometers: NCT, iCARE, and GAT. The measurements with these three devices were compared. RESULTS: The mean IOP was 18.1 ± 2.4 mmHg (range 13-25 mmHg) with GAT, 22.3 ±5.0 mmHg (range 13-35 mmHg) with NCT, and 18.0 ±2.4 mmHg (range 13.3-26 mmHg) with iCARE. The mean difference between the GAT and iCARE measurements (using the Bland-Altman analysis) was -0.1 ±1.16 mmHg (limits of agreement -2.4 to 2.1). The mean difference between the GAT and NCT measurements was 4.2 ±3.6 mmHg (limits of agreement -2.8 to 11.2). The mean difference between the iCARE and NCT measurements was -4.3 ±3.7 mmHg (limits of agreement -11.6 to 2.9). No significant difference was found between GAT and iCARE (p = 1.000). However, there was a significant difference between GAT and NCT (p < 0.0001), as well as between iCARE and NCT (p < 0.0001).  Conclusions: In patients with TAO, NCT significantly overestimates IOP values compared to the GAT and ICare. By contrast, the iCARE rebound tonometer provides IOP measurements comparable to the gold standard GAT in these patients.